Antoinette Tuff wiki, Son, Story, Husband, Net Worth
Antoinette Tuff wiki, Son, Story, Husband, Net Worth – When Barack Obama urged the people of the US to pressure lawmakers into passing gun control legislation in January, he issued the following dire warning: “Every day we wait [the number of Americans who die at the end of a gun] will keep growing.” One of those days was supposed to be last Tuesday. 20-year-old Michael Hill entered Ronald E. McNair Discovery Learning Academy in Decatur, Georgia with an assault rifle in the AK-47 style, 500 rounds of ammo, and “nothing to live for” while legislation sat orphaned in Congress.
Antoinette Tuff’s courage demonstrates what politics lacks.
Hill admitted that he had not been taking his psychiatric medicine, and with 870 children inside between the ages of five and eleven, the country was likely facing another tragic school massacre.
Luckily for everyone, Hill kidnapped Antoinette Tuff, the school’s bookkeeper. Tuff then displayed incredible composure and brinksmanship, which was all captured on her call to emergency services. During this time, she was able to successfully negotiate between Hill and the police.
She addressed him as “sir” at first, then “sweetie” and “baby” afterwards. “We’re not going to hate you,” she continued. Tuff reported that she was afraid when her pastor began speaking about anchoring and how to firmly ground oneself on the Lord. I simply sat down and began to pray.
She then confided in Hill about her divorce and her son’s disability in between updates with the 911 dispatcher while comforting him throughout. I cherish you. I’m happy for you. Everybody has difficulties throughout life. You will be OK. Sweetheart. Last year, after my husband left me, I attempted suicide. She eventually got him to lay down, surrender, and hand over his guns while she kept the police at bay.
Wayne LaPierre, the president of the National Rifle Association, argued the incident was not evidence of the need for more gun regulation but rather more guns after the massacres in Newtown, Connecticut, which left 20 children and six adults dead. “A good guy with a gun is the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun,” he declared.
Tuff’s actions demonstrate that neither males nor firearms are required. A lady who possesses a high degree of emotional intelligence, great poise, and an abundance of empathy can complete the task and keep everyone alive.
The availability of guns, healthcare (Hill was without his medication because his Medicaid had expired), and mental health services (poor provision in the US makes prisons and jails the main facilities, effectively criminalizing mental illness) are just a few of the policy issues that this incident raises beyond its own dramatic implications. But it also brings up two more general cultural issues.
First of all, Tuff’s existence cannot be guaranteed by legislation. And even if they could, expecting such bravery from anyone would be ridiculous. They can still gain a lot from her, though. She tells us a lot about what is lacking in our politics because of her generosity of spirit, ability to humanize the prospective gunman, and capability to relate to him via her own flaws.
Our politics are based on the premise that people are essentially venal, selfish, dishonest, and untrustworthy, especially in an era of terror, austerity, and rising inequality. Foreigners are thought to be stealing from cultures rather than adding to them, while public sector employees like Tuff are thought to be uncommitted to serving the public and a burden on our taxpayers rather than actively seeking employment. The well-being of the disabled is assumed. In a large portion of Western political culture, the natural reaction to others is not to perceive ourselves in them but rather a threat.
Tuff’s bravery serves as the most dramatic example of how much more magnificent we are and can be than what our politics would have us believe. Few people possess Tuff’s level of skill. The desire to assist and serve others is shared by everyone, and everyone has the capacity to empathize with others.
There are numerous examples. Like Vicco, Kentucky, a small working-class Appalachian community with a population of 355 that approved the legalization of homosexual marriage in January, or Natasha Knotts, who met Hill at her husband’s church and set out to act as a mother figure for him. “I don’t have the papers, but I do have the heart,” she added.
We now come to the second topic, which is about religion. Tuff’s ability to handle the circumstance was derived from and through her faith. For many people, religion has that effect. This grounds them. It’s how people make sense of their surroundings, their position in it, and their interactions with others. It serves as the foundation of many people’s identities and communities.
I don’t practice religion; I used to be an atheist. I used to be ignorant before simply ceasing to care. I, however, am a liberal secularist. I think that the state should not be influenced by religion and that no one, not even the government, has the authority to tell women what to dress.
However, disparaging not just faith but the believers (with particular contempt reserved for Islam) has become trendy, especially among those in Europe who consider themselves progressive. Too frequently, people who position themselves as the arbiters of reason present religion as the root of the world’s ills and the devout as its uncritical pawns, mistaking incivility for humor.
We shouldn’t be too shocked after a decade that saw George Bush and Osama bin Laden battle it out to the death. In the name of religion, awful things have been done. They have also committed atrocious acts in the name of reason, from Pol Pot to the horror regime that followed the French Revolution.
While we set aside the accomplishments of Desmond Tutu, Martin Luther King, Trevor Huddleston, Bruce Kent, Harriet Tubman, Muhammad Ali, Gandhi, and Malcolm X for the moment, where does mocking religion leave Tuff? A victim or a rescuer?
Not all of us can be that brave. But as long as we don’t hurt anybody else along the way, we all deserve a political culture that assumes the best in us rather than caving into the worst, as well as the freedom to discover our best selves without being held in contempt.