John Lauro Wiki, Wikipedia, Attorney, Bio, Interview, Who Is, Comments, Educational Background
John Lauro Wiki, Wikipedia, Attorney, Bio, Interview, Who Is, Comments, Educational Background -: In order to explore the potential for a third charge, John Lauro and other attorneys for former President Donald Trump met with prosecutors at special counsel Jack Smith’s office.
Smith’s group met with Trump’s attorneys John Lauro and Todd Blanche. A Smith prosecutor and the jury could be seen walking into the courthouse, according to CNN. The group representing the former president of the United States departed the meeting without learning when a third indictment may be brought. These discussions, according to Axios, provide defense lawyers a chance to make their final case against any potential accusations that their clients might be facing. After receiving a target letter from Smith earlier this month, Trump battled against scheduling a meeting between his attorneys and Smith’s team. The indictment had already been made public, thus the 45th president believed the meeting was useless.
Who Is John Lauro?
The law company Lauro & Singer is Lauro’s founding member and the designated partner was John Lauro. He was brought up in New York City and eventually graduated with honors from Georgetown University.
While still a college student, he was selected to work as an advisory neighborhood commissioner in the District of Columbia. He graduated with a magna cum laude from the Georgetown University Law Centre. He served on the editorial board of the Georgetown Law Journal.
After returning to New York, he continued his legal career there with Morgan, Lewis, and Bockius. Later, he established a practice in Florida and became a partner in a sizable law company there. In 1994, he founded The Lauro Law Firm, presently known as Lauro & Singer. The law practice has offices in both Florida and New York.
On the law firm’s website, Lauro is referred to as “an accomplished trial lawyer with experience in complex criminal and commercial litigation”. Mr. Lauro handles cases involving conspiracies, healthcare, and accounting in addition to other white-collar and business litigation issues.
In the past, John Lauro has taken on some pretty high-profile cases, including assisting the former president of a national healthcare company in obtaining a Rule 29 acquittal in a prominent federal criminal case and representing a defendant in the first “dot-com securities fraud” case, which resulted in a jury acquittal on all counts.
John Lauro News
The indictment, according to Trump’s attorney, is an “attack on free speech and political advocacy.”
The latest accusation against the former president, according to John Lauro, is “an attack on free speech and political advocacy.”
Follow along for real-time updates on former president Donald Trump’s indictment by the Justice Department for attempting to rig the 2020 election. The accusations center on plots by Trump and his allies to thwart the handover of power and maintain his position in office despite losing to Joe Biden.
Trump has now received a third indictment. Here are the results of all the investigations.
Trump was also charged in June with allegedly hoarding confidential materials.
Mar-a-The property manager at Lago is the newest member of the Trump team to get involved in legal trouble.
Special counsel Jack Smith has fought corruption for a long time.
An indictment is referred to as an “attack on free speech and political advocacy” by Trump’s attorney.
John Lauro, the former president’s attorney, referred to the most recent charges against him as “an attack on free speech and political advocacy.”
It is “an effort to not only criminalize but also to censor free speech” from Trump, Lauro claimed in an interview with CNN on Tuesday night.
Trump, he claimed, was informed “that there were problems” with the 2020 presidential election by people, and “he also saw in real time that the rules were changing without the state legislatures weighing in.”
He claimed that Trump was depending on the legal counsel of John Eastman. Eastman was the creator of a legal plan intended to keep Trump in office.
Trump will appear either remotely or in person in Washington on Thursday, according to Lauro, who added that the judge will decide how he does it.
Congressional leaders’ responses to Trump’s most recent indictment generally along party lines.
The Jan. 6, 2021 riot at the U.S. Capitol was “one of the saddest and most infamous days in American history, personally orchestrated by Donald Trump and fueled by his insidious Big Lie,” according to Democratic Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries.
However, a large number of Trump’s congressional Republican friends criticized the indictment and its timing.
Republicans are attempting to tie President Joe Biden to his son’s business transactions and hinting at an impeachment investigation against him. On Monday, congressional testimony from a former business associate of Hunter Biden was released. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy commented on the hearing on social media.
McCarthy wrote on the social media site X, formerly known as Twitter, “Everyone in America could see what was going to come next: DOJ’s attempt to distract from the news and attack the frontrunner for the Republican nomination, President Trump.”
The third-ranking Republican in the House, Rep. Elise Stefanik of New York, referred to the indictment as “an illegal attempt to interfere in the 2024 election.”
Mitch McConnell, the Senate Minority Leader, who blamed Trump for Jan. 6 in a fiery speech two years ago just after voting to exonerate Trump in an associated impeachment hearing, was silent Tuesday night.
Trump’s Jan. 6 case has been handed to a strict judge who harshly penalized Capitol rioters.
One of the harshest reprimanders of the rioters who rushed the U.S. Capitol in an attack spurred by former President Donald Trump’s unfounded allegations of a stolen election has been the federal judge assigned to the case against him for election fraud. She had previously ruled against him.
Trump is scheduled to appear before Tanya Chutkan, a U.S. District Judge who was once an associate public defender and was appointed to the bench by President Barack Obama, on Thursday. In instances involving the Jan. 6, 2021 violence, she frequently imposed heavier prison terms than what Justice Department prosecutors suggested.
Chutkan already decided against Trump in a different lawsuit on January 6.
She rejected his request in November 2021 to invoke executive privilege to prevent the disclosure of information to the U.S. House’s Jan. 6 committee. Even after President Joe Biden gave the National Archives permission to turn up the materials, she rejected his claims that he could claim privilege over them.
Chutkan famously stated in her decision that “Presidents are not kings, and Plaintiff is not President.”
Trump’s GOP challengers in 2024 are responding differently to the indictment against him.
Rivals of Donald Trump for the Republican presidential nomination in 2024 have differing opinions about the most recent indictment brought against him.
His main rival, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, didn’t stand up for Trump. However, if elected president, DeSantis promised to “end weaponization of government, replace the FBI Director, and ensure a single standard of justice for all Americans” in a post published on the X platform, formerly known as Twitter, on Tuesday.
Two of Trump’s most outspoken detractors in the field, former Texas congressman Will Hurd and former governor of Arkansas Asa Hutchinson, released comments stating that Trump should not be the next president of the United States.
Trump’s “denial of the 2020 election results and actions on Jan. 6 show he’s unfit for office,” Hurd wrote in a post on X.
Trump “is morally responsible for the attack on our democracy,” according to Hutchinson, who also urged him to drop out of the race “for the good of the country.”
Vivek Ramaswamy, a biotech entrepreneur who ran for office as Trump’s ideological ally and even made a promise to pardon him if he won, gave the candidate a resolute defense.
Ramaswamy asserted that Trump “isn’t the real cause for what happened on January 6” and instead attributed the violence to “systematic and pervasive censorship of citizens.”
Pence criticizes Trump’s behavior in relation to the disturbance at the US Capitol on January 6.
Mike Pence, a former vice president, on Tuesday, released the sharpest criticism he has ever leveled at Donald Trump for his conduct during the Jan. 6, 2021 riot at the U.S. Capitol, which compelled Pence to flee as some of the crowd yelled “Hang Mike Pence.”
Following the indictment of Trump for his efforts to rig the 2020 election, Pence released a statement in which he emphasized the need of serving as a strong reminder that “anyone who puts himself over the Constitution should never be President of the United States.”
Trump, his former employer, and running partner is being challenged by Pence for the GOP candidature in 2024, but he is far behind Trump in the polls. Pence has occasionally avoided Trump or given tactful criticism.
However, Pence claimed in his remarks on Tuesday that Trump had forced him to choose between the Constitution and Trump on January 6 and that he had done so.
“Our nation is more significant than any one man. The importance of our constitution outweighs that of any one man’s career, he declared.
Trump allegedly put pressure on Pence to postpone or prevent election certification, according to the indictment.
The 18-month U.S. House inquiry into the 2021 Capitol rebellion was soon followed by the indictment brought against Donald Trump. But it also generates fresh data that wasn’t covered in the committee’s final report to the House on January 6th.
According to the report, Trump and Vice President Mike Pence had a number of discussions in which Trump urged Pence to delay certifying the 2020 election or reject the presidential electors. According to the indictment, Trump told Pence, “You’re too honest,” during one call on January 1, 2021.
Pence declined to give testimony before the House committee after escaping the crowd of protestors at the Capitol. But he provided testimony to the federal grand jury looking into Trump.
When the new information revealed how Trump had pressed the vice president, Pence said, “You know I don’t think I have the authority to change the outcome.”
According to the indictment, Trump and his accomplices initially tried to persuade Pence to disregard or not count legal electoral votes during the certification scheduled for January 6.
When that failed, the indictment claims that Trump and his accomplices falsely informed a crowd of supporters gathered in Washington on the morning of January 6 that Pence had the authority to tamper with the election results and instructed them to go to the Capitol to obstruct the certification of the vote and pressure Pence.
According to the indictment, Trump repeatedly defied orders to instruct rioters to leave the U.S. Capitol on January 6.
The indictment against Donald Trump describes his alleged behaviors leading up to his supporters’ riot at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, including certain instances of purposeful inaction.
The accusations announced on Tuesday are the first time the former president is publicly being held accountable for his conduct in the lead-up to the violent mob siege of the Capitol, despite Trump’s escalating legal troubles elsewhere. The incident has been blamed on about 1,000 people, some of whom are currently serving lengthy sentences.
Trump “repeatedly refused to approve a message” ordering the rioters to depart, the indictment claims, as they ransacked the Capitol and interfered with the certification of the 2020 election results. He apparently refused the advice of the White House Counsel Pat Cipollone, Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, and several other senior officials.
According to the indictment, Trump and his aides increased their efforts to disseminate rumors of electoral fraud by taking advantage of the chaos created by the violence.
The indictment claims that on the evening of January 6, as the Capitol was being cleared of rioters, Trump and an unidentified co-conspirator called senators to try to persuade them to postpone the certification.
Trump inquiry is the largest in the history of the agency, according to Attorney General Garland.
The Justice Department’s investigation into Donald Trump’s attempts to rig the 2020 presidential election, according to Attorney General Merrick Garland, “followed the facts and the law wherever they lead.”
On Tuesday, shortly after Trump was charged for the second time by the federal agency he formerly oversaw, Garland made a few brief remarks in Philadelphia.
In order to oversee the investigation into the disturbance on January 6, 2021, in the U.S. Capitol and Trump’s attempts to alter the election results, Garland hired special counsel Jack Smith last year.
The probe, according to Garland, was the biggest in the department’s history and resulted in four accusations of obstruction and conspiracy against Trump.
Additionally, the Justice Department has filed 40 counts against Trump for improper handling of sensitive documents. Smith was in charge of that inquiry as well.
Thursday will be Trump’s third court appearance as a defendant in a criminal case.
Donald Trump is due to show up in court as a criminal defendant for the third time.
Trump is scheduled to appear in court on Thursday in front of U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan in Washington for the allegations he is facing in connection with his attempts to rig the 2020 election.
In the indictment issued on Tuesday, Trump is charged with four counts of conspiracy, including “conspiracy to defraud” the United States.
Trump appeared in court in April to enter a not-guilty plea to 34 charges related to a hush-money conspiracy from the 2016 presidential race.
He entered a not-guilty plea to 37 accusations that he unlawfully hoarded confidential papers in June when he appeared in federal court in Florida. Prosecutors allegedly charged him with asking a staff member to erase video footage from his Florida home in order to thwart a federal investigation into the records. Last week, they filed new accusations in that case. In that situation, he now faces 40 counts.
Trump is the first former president to be charged with a crime and the first to be put on trial by the administration he previously oversaw.
Attack on the U.S. Capitol on January 6 was “fueled by lies” by Trump, the special counsel claims
The attack on the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, was “fueled by lies” from Donald Trump, according to Justice Department Special Counsel Jack Smith, whose team of prosecutors questioned key Trump administration officials before a grand jury in Washington.
Following the revelation of the indictment against the former president on Tuesday, Smith gave a brief statement in Washington.
Smith remarked, “The attack on our nation’s capital on January 6, 2021, was an unprecedented assault on the seat of American democracy,” and he called the law enforcement personnel who defended the Capitol that day “heroes.”
Smith declared he would work to have the former president tried quickly.
Trump is scheduled to appear before U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan on Thursday.
Trump wanted to create an “atmosphere of mistrust and anger,” according to the indictment.
In the indictment against Donald Trump, it is detailed how numerous Republican state officials, Justice Department employees, and members of the president’s campaign team disproved his assertions about the 2020 election, including those “on whom he relied for candid advice on important matters.”
For instance, four days after receiving a denial from Georgia’s senior elections official, Trump asserted that more than 10,000 dead persons had cast ballots there. After being informed it was untrue by his own Acting Attorney General, he claimed there were 205,000 more ballots cast in Pennsylvania than there were registered voters. Even though his own campaign manager admitted that was untrue, he claimed that more than 30,000 non-citizens cast ballots in Arizona.
The meeting between President Trump and General Mark Milley, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, on January 3, 2021, was discussed by the prosecution.
Given that his inauguration was just 17 days away, Milley and another adviser advised Trump against acting on the matter. According to the indictment, Trump allegedly answered, “Yeah, you’re right, it’s too late for us.” “We’ll give that to the next guy,” said the group.
The indictment claims that while knowing his election statements to be untrue, Trump continued to spread them in order to foster an “intense national atmosphere of mistrust and anger” and “erode public faith in the administration of the election.”
A MONTHS-LONG ATTEMPT TO CHANGE THE RESULTS BECOMES CRIME, STATES THE INDICTMENT
Trump had the right to formally challenge the outcome of the 2020 presidential election, according to federal prosecutors, but his actions turned illegal after a months-long campaign that sought to discredit eligible voters and tamper with the results.
Prosecutors said in court filings submitted on Tuesday that Trump had a right, like every American, “to speak publicly about the election and even to claim, falsely, that there had been outcome-determinative fraud during the election and that he had won.”
He had the right to file litigation and formally contest the election results, both of which he did. But soon after the vote, Trump also violated the law by trying to rig the results, according to the indictment.
From November 14, 2020, through January 20, 2021, a months-long scheme to defraud the United States was described in the indictment, involving Trump and the other defendants.
The indictment stated that the conspiracy’s goal was to void the valid outcomes of the 2020 presidential election.
Prosecutors: An attempt was made to obstruct the vote by recruiting phony electors.
Federal prosecutors claim that after losing the 2020 presidential election, Trump and his aides tried to “obstruct the electoral vote through the deceit of state officials” by enlisting phony electors.
According to the indictment announced on Tuesday, Trump and his unidentified co-conspirators knowingly spread false information about election fraud in order to persuade officials in seven crucial states — Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin — to submit phony slates of electors.
In order to certify the winner of the popular vote in their state, state parties nominate electors.
Trump allegedly started “marshaling individuals who would have served” as his electors in those states in early December 2020 after his attempts to deceive state officials “met with repeated failure,” according to the prosecution. He also allegedly sent false certifications claiming that they were valid presidential electors.
Prosecutors allege that Trump and an unidentified co-conspirator directed “sham proceedings” of fraudulent electors in the seven targeted states on December 14, 2020, the day when the legal electors met in all 50 states.
According to the indictment, some fictitious electors were duped into thinking that their votes would only be counted if Trump was successful in his legal challenges in their state. Additionally, it claims that Trump tried to utilize the Justice Department to carry out “sham election crime investigations” and send letters to certain states claiming falsely that investigators had found problems with the election.
Trump lied despite being warned by top officials, according to the indictment.
According to the indictment brought against Trump on Tuesday, he continued to make false comments about the election despite repeated warnings from high-ranking government officials.
The prosecution referenced a case in Georgia where Trump asserted that more than 10,000 dead persons had cast ballots in just four days despite being informed that this was untrue by the state’s chief elections officer. Georgia went to Democrat Joe Biden, not Trump.
After being informed that this was untrue by his own acting attorney general, the Republican claimed that there were 205,000 more ballots cast in Pennsylvania than there were registered voters. He claimed that more than 30,000 non-citizens had cast ballots in Arizona, despite the fact that his own campaign manager had denied this.
THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN TERMS THE LATEST INDICATION A ‘WITCH HUNT’
The third charge against the former president, according to a statement from Trump’s campaign, is “nothing more than the latest corrupt chapter” in what the campaign referred to as a politically motivated “witch hunt.”
Trump’s team expressed its displeasure with the timing in a lengthy statement released after the indictment was made public on Tuesday. In it, they questioned why it had taken prosecutors two and a half years to file the charges, during the heart of the campaign and as Republicans stepped up their inquiries into Vice President Joe Biden.
Election tampering is the solution, the statement said.
According to the presidential campaign, “President Trump has always followed the law and the Constitution, with advice from many highly accomplished attorneys.”
Trump knew his election-related lies were untrue, according to prosecutors.
In the indictment released on Tuesday, federal prosecutors claimed that Trump was aware that his lies about losing the 2020 presidential election were untrue but continued to spread them.
According to the prosecution, the Republican circulated lies for two months following his defeat on November 3, 2020, in an effort to sow an “intense national atmosphere of mistrust and anger” and “erode public faith in the administration of the election.”
Trump is accused of four offenses: conspiracy to defraud the United States, obstruction, conspiracy to prevent Congress from certifying Biden’s victory in the Jan. 6 election, and conspiracy to suppress the right to vote.
The indictment names Donald Trump as a defendant, but it also lists six other unnamed accomplices, including one lawyer “who was willing to spread knowingly false claims and pursue strategies” that Trump’s 2020 campaign lawyers would not.
A second conspirator is a lawyer, whose “unfounded claims of election fraud” Trump admitted in private to others sounded “crazy,” according to the indictment.
Charges against Trump include conspiracy to commit fraud on four counts.
For his attempts to rig the 2020 presidential election, Trump has been charged by the Justice Department on four counts, including conspiracy to defraud the United States.
The third criminal case brought against the former president, who is currently the front-runner in the GOP presidential primary for 2024, was indicted on Tuesday night.
According to the 45-page indictment, Trump was “determined to remain in power” after losing the 2020 election and engaged in schemes that attacked a “bedrock function of the United States federal government: the nation’s process of collecting, counting, and certifying the results of the presidential election.”
The latest charge was compared by a Trump spokeswoman to “Nazi Germany in the 1930s, the former Soviet Union, and other authoritarian, dictatorial regimes,” calling them “un-American.”
Trump was charged with attempting to rig the 2020 presidential election.
The Justice Department has charged Trump with attempting to void the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.
The indictment focuses on tactics used by Trump and his allies to thwart the handover of power and maintain their control of the White House notwithstanding their defeat by Joe Biden. As the former president tries to retake the White House, a third criminal case has been brought against him.
The criminal lawsuit is being brought when Trump is leading the Republican race for the 2024 presidential nominee. It focuses on the chaotic two months between Donald Trump’s election loss in November 2020 and the riot at the US Capitol on January 6, 2021. Trump disputes any wrongdoing.
A few times before the indictment was made public, Trump claimed Smith’s team was attempting to sway the election with “yet another Fake Indictment.”
Why wasn’t this done two and a half years ago? On his Truth Social website, he questioned, “Why did they wait for so long? “Because they wanted to place it in the center of my campaign,” they said. “Prosecutorial Insubordination!”
Also Read :
- Zhanna Samsonova Wikipedia, Wiki, D Art, Instagram, News, Youtube, Vegan, Age, Images, Facebook, Husband
- Mary Mccord Wikipedia, Age, Biography, Husband, Twitter, Family, Education, Bio, Podcast
- Laura Jarrett Wikipedia, News, Husband, Nationality, Parents, Age, Instagram, Feet, Ethnicity, Salary, Father, Mother, Race, Wiki