Rachel Bitcofer Wikipedia, Family, Age, Net Worth, Height, Wiki, Bio
Rachel Bitcofer Wikipedia, Family, Age, Net Worth, Height, Wiki, Bio – One of the well-known public figures from the US is political scientist Rachel Bitecofer. Although she has worked in the media for a considerable amount of time, she has always performed best when she keeps a low profile.
Rachel Bitecofer Bio
|Age||35-40 years old|
|Date Of Birth||Not Known|
|Zodiac Sign||Not Known|
Rachel Bitecofer Physical Stats
|Height||5 Feet 6 Inch|
|Eye Colour||Not Known|
|Hair Colour||Not Known|
|Shoe Size||Not Known|
Rachel Bitecofer Educational Qualifications
|College or University||The University of Georgia |
University of Oregon
|Educational Degree||Not Known|
Rachel Bitecofer Family
|Brother / Sister||Not Known|
|Children||Son: Not Known|
Daughter: Not Known
Rachel Bitecofer’s Marital Status
|Spouse Name||Not Known|
|Married Date||Not Known|
Rachel Bitecofer Collection & Net Worth
|Net Worth||$ 1-5 Million|
Rachel Bitecofer’s Social Media Accounts
Rachel Bitecofer News
What if everything you believe to be true about politics is in fact false? What if there aren’t any true swing votes in America, or if there aren’t any enough to choose the next president? What if the Democratic nominee’s identity doesn’t really matter? What if there is no such thing as “the middle” and the party in power is able to rule however it pleases for two years because the outcomes of the first midterm election are going to be poor regardless? What if Democrats won the majority of 41 seats in the 2018 midterm elections not because candidates prioritised health care and everyday issues, but rather because they were campaigning against the administration? What if the result in 2020 is also essentially predetermined?
All of that is very definitely true, according to political scientist Rachel Bitecofer, who is perhaps one of the most intriguing new voices in political forecasting this year.
Before November 2018, Bitecofer, a 42-year-old professor at Christopher Newport University in the Hampton Roads region of Virginia, was hardly recognised in the overwhelmingly online and male-dominated field of political forecasting.
In spite of other forecasters’ shaky predictions in the closing days of the election, she then accurately predicted the size and character of the Democrats’ victory in the House. Additionally, she released her prognosis in July and stayed with it even when polling changed throughout the summer and fall.
Yet as of right now, her model predicts that the Democrats will almost certainly win the White House in 2020, add seats to the House, and have a good chance of taking back the Senate. If she is correct, the eras of economics, incumbency, and record while in government are all gone from politics. Her research amounts to nothing less of “turning enormous concepts of electoral theory upside down,” as Bitecofer puts it with trademark immodesty.
When it comes down to it, Bitecofer’s argument holds that changes in who decides to vote are more likely to affect current American elections than changes in voter preferences. She is seen by some of her detractors as an extreme proponent of the adage that “turnout explains everything,” doing a long victory lap after hitting it big once. She offers a somewhat different perspective, arguing that recent elections prove that American politics have indeed evolved and that other academics have been slow to see its implications.